Attacks against Sheikh Hamza Yusuf

http://www.hamzayusuf.faithweb.com/ I found this website recently and found that it vilifies and disparages Sheikh Hamzah Yusuf. Below is Sheikh GF Haddad’s response to wahabiyya baseless attacks against Sheikh Hamzah Yusuf.

RE: Accusations on Shaykh Hamza Yusuf
Answered by Shaykh Gibril F Haddad

There are many things being spread about Shaykh Hamza Yusuf by the opposite parties saying he interprets Quran wrongly , shows daeef ahadith .. condemns suicide bombers to hell fire and calls the fire fighters who saved people from world trade centre as Jihadis and destined to paradise !! then Hamza Yusuf saying that in the Quran the word Jihad is not even used once to present the military form of Jihad .. could you please shed some light on this as I read some emails by Shaykh Yusuf Estes bashing him in his long emails.

Wa `alaykum as-Salam:

Yusuf Estes is not qualified to say anything but good about Sidi Hamza as Estes only stands to learn from him. Estes belongs to a group of persons that speak in the name of Islam while openly admitting that they “do not follow any schools of thought” i.e. they are misguided cf. http://adly.net/Association/WebsiteArticles.html They also hold the Awliya’ of Allah in contempt — may Allah Almighty give them their just deserts.

Whatever one’s position on the issue, it remains that the condemnation of suicide bombers of civilians to hell fire is not new nor exclusive to Shaykh Hamza but I have heard it from the Ba `Alawi Shuyukh as per Shaykh Abu Bakr al-`Attas at the Muhammad Fatih Institute in Beirut. It is also the position of al-Albani as cited by Yusuf Estes’ Salafite director, Muhammad Adly at http://laila.aresworld.net/suicidebomb.html

And whoever saves one life it is as if he saved all humankind. As for jihad not being military HY is right with respect to all the Makkan Suras; I heard this from Dr. Sa`id al-Buti in one of his Jumu`a sermons. Allah Most High said:

{And whosoever STRIVES (JAAHADA), STRIVES (YUJAAHIDU) only for himself} (29:6). {As for those who STRIVE (JAHADU) in Us (the cause of Allah), We surely guide them to Our paths, and lo! Allah is with the good doers.} (29:69) This is a Meccan Sura and the two verses refer to Jihad al-Nafs. There was no military jihad then.

Also, jihad is not based on a murderous heart but a cleansed heart. Without jihad of the nafs, fighting leads to Hellfire.

Allah Most High said:

{WA NAFSIN WA MAA SAWAAHA, FA-ALHAMAHA FUJURAHA WA TAQWAHA. QAD AFLAHA MAN ZAKAAHA WA QAD KHAABA MAN DAS-SAAHA} “By the nafs and the proportion and order given to it, and its inspiration as to its wrong and its right; Truly he succeeds who purifies it, and he fails that corrupts it” (91:7-10). This is also a Meccan Sura.

Without purification, the nafs remains a “soul that enjoins evil” (al-nafs al-ammara bil-su’) until it surrenders itself in total obedience to the call of animal passions and shaytan.

Allah Most High said:

{Have you seen the one who chooses for his god his own lust?} (25:43). {He followed his own lust. Therefore his likeness is as the likeness of a dog; if you attack him he pants with his tongue out and if you leave him he pants with his tongue out} (7:176). These are both also Meccan Suras.

About the person who controlled the passion of his ego Allah says: {But as for him who feared to stand before his Lord and restrained his soul from lust, Lo! The garden will be his home} (79:40-41). This is also a Meccan Sura.

The above are among the many Meccan verses and Suras enjoining jihad al-nafs. One that denies that there was/is such a Divine command commits kufr. Such a command cannot mean military jihad, as there was no permission – much less an order – for such a jihad until the Madinan period.

>another question is that Sufis use 2 ahadith very often > when they talk about Jihad and those are…… The best > Jihad is to fight against your nafs

This is firmly established as true from the glorious Qur’an.

Further, the Prophet said, upon him peace:

1. <
> – Ibn Hibban (#1624, 2519): Authentic; – Shu`ayb al-Arna’ut (Commentary on Ibn Hibban): authentic; – al-Hakim: sahih; – `Iraqi confirms him; – it is also in Tirmidhi, Ahmad, and Tabarani; – Albani included it in the “Sahiha”.

2. “`A’isha, Allah be well-pleased with her, asked: ‘Messenger of Allah, we see jihad as the best of deeds, so shouldn’t we join it?’ He replied, ‘But the best jihad is a perfect Hajj (pilgrimage to Makkah).'” (Sahih Al-Bukhari #2784)

3. On another occasion, a man asked: “Should I join the jihad?” The Prophet asked, upon him peace, “Do you have parents?” The man said yes. The Prophet said: “Then do jihad by serving them!” (Sahih Al-Bukhari #5972)

4. Another man asked: “What kind of jihad is better?” The Prophet replied, upon him peace: “A word of truth spoken in front of an oppressive ruler.” (Sunan Al-Nasa’i #4209)

5. The Prophet also said, upon him peace: <
> Al-Haythami declared it authentic in Majma` al-Zawa’id.

6. The Prophet, upon him peace, said to Abu Sa`id al-Khudri: “Even if one strikes unbelievers and idolaters with his sword until it breaks, and he is *completely* dyed with their blood, the Rememberers of Allah are above him one degree.”

and the second hadith > of Rasul Ullah coming back from a battle and saying we >are coming back from Jihad e Asghar to Jihad e Akbar .. >its said that both these ahadith are extremely weak ,

Let them complain of Ibn al-Qayyim who writes page after page about the jihad of the ego as the greatest jihad in his book al-Fawa’id.

Even if a hadith is very weak it does not mean it is forged. As for these particular hadiths, it is incorrect to say they are very weak for various reasons (see below).

>Please give me exact references of these ahadith and the > classical scholars who authenticated them

The “greater jihad” hadith is narrated variously thus:

1. As a saying of the Prophet, upon him blessings and peace, from Jabir – Allah be well-pleased with him – in the wording:

<>

Narrated with a very weak chain containing Yahya ibn al-`Ala’ al-Bajali al-Razi (who is accused of forgery) by al-Bayhaqi in al-Zuhd al-Kabir (p. 165 §373=p. 198 §374) and al-Khatib in Tarikh Baghdad (13:493=13:523) cf. al-Ahdab, Zawa’id Tarikh Baghdad (9:309-311 §2077). This is the narration cited by Imam al-Ghazzali in the Ihya’ and thus sourced by al-`Iraqi in his documentation.

However, even if the wording is inauthentic, the meaning of the last phrase i.e. that the greater jihad is the struggle against hawa/nafs IS CONFIRMED AS SAHIH by the verses quoted above and by the narrations of the previous section: 1, 5, and 6.

2. As a saying of the Companions `Abd Allah ibn `Amr ibn al-`As as cited by Ibn Rajab in his Sharh Hadith Labbayk (p. 128).

3. As a saying of the Tabi`i Ibrahim ibn Abi `Abla narrated by al-Nasa’i in his Kuna in the wording:

“You have come back from the smaller jihad; what about the greater one?” They asked, “What is the greater jihad?” He [Ibn Abi `Abla] replied: “The jihad of the heart.”

Al-Qari said in al-Asrar al-Marfu`a: al-`Asqalani in Tasdid al-Qaws (“Adjusting the Bow”) said, “This report is famous and widespread but these are the words of Ibrahim ibn Abi `Abla as narrated in al-Nasa’i’s Kuna.”

4. As a saying of Ibrahim ibn Ad-ham as narrated by al-Bayhaqi in al-Zuhd (p. 152).

5. As a saying of Abu Hatim al-Asamm as narrated by al-Bayhaqi in al-Zuhd (p. 286).

See also: al-Mizzi, Tahdhib al-Kamal (2:144); Ibn Hajar, Tahdhib al-Tahdhib (1:142), al-Kafi al-Shafi fi Takhrij Ahadith al-Kashshaf (p. 114), and Tasdid al-Qaws (cf. al-`Ajluni, Kashf al-Khafa’); and al-Zayla`i, Takhrij al-Ahadith wal-Athar al-Waqi`a fi Tafsir al-Kashshaf (2:395-396 §825).

Hajj Gibril

——————————————————————————–

And BY THE WAY

**The supposed letters of Yusuf Estes which he supposedly wrote against Hamzah Yusuf has been denied by the former himself. He has stated that :
“The words you quote (above) are not my words, they have been added – others have been taking what I wrote (in private) to a brother years ago, and copied then altered and changed and posted on the web my comments…

All of this is haram and whoever does try to divide the Muslims with such tactics will have to face Allah for what they are doing.”

The letters may be found at wahabi owned websites like
http://nuh.faithweb.com/index.html and http://www.allaahuakbar.net

Advertisements
Explore posts in the same categories: miscellany, Uncategorized

5 Comments on “Attacks against Sheikh Hamza Yusuf”

  1. Islamic Mission Foundation International (formely the organization of Yusuf Estes) Says:

    Salam `alaykum:

    We, the Islamic Mission Foundation International, realized the deceit of our former director, “Shaikh” Yusuf Estes when he started to slander Shaykh Hamza Yusuf. We later contacted Zaytuna Institute and clarified that “Shaikh” Yusuf Estes (who is evidently not even a Shaikh but a deviant Da`ee) was slandering Shaykh Hamza and that he had shown his ignorance in his miscontruing of Shaykh Hamza’s statement and that many things “Shaikh” Yusuf Estes said were not true (such as his lie about Shaykh Muhammad al-Yaqu`bi and forcing someone to do Dhikr) . Until we contacted Zaytuna, we believed Yusuf Estes’ lies against Shaykh Hamza and we were all la-madhabis until Zaytuna Institute guided us.

    In conclusion, Yusuf Estes is a liar. We took him out of our organization…. We all support Shaykh Hamza Yusuf against the deciet of the liar Estes!

    May Allah forgive us.

  2. Sa`id Hasan Says:

    Wa `alaykum salam:

    Wait, Yusuf Estes, as much I dislike his email about Shaykh Hamza, is/was never part of any organization by that name. The above comment is a fake.

    Nonetheless, I do think that Yusuf Estes miscontrued and took many things about Shaykh Hamza Yusuf out of context

    Wasalamu `alaykum.

  3. Ahmad Afzal Shah (Chairman of the Islamic Mission Foundation International) Says:

    Salam `alaykum:

    We, the Islamic Mission Foundation International, realized the deceit of our former director, “Shaikh” Yusuf Estes when he started to slander Shaykh Hamza Yusuf. We later contacted Zaytuna Institute and clarified that “Shaikh” Yusuf Estes (who is evidently not even a Shaikh but a deviant Da`ee) was slandering Shaykh Hamza and that he had shown his ignorance in his miscontruing of Shaykh Hamza’s statement and that many things “Shaikh” Yusuf Estes said were not true (such as his lie about Shaykh Muhammad al-Yaqu`bi and forcing someone to do Dhikr) . Until we contacted Zaytuna, we believed Yusuf Estes’ lies against Shaykh Hamza and we were all la-madhabis until Zaytuna Institute guided us.

    In conclusion, Yusuf Estes is a liar. We took him out of our organization…. We all support Shaykh Hamza Yusuf against the deciet of the liar Estes!

    May Allah forgive us.

    Sincerely,

    A. Ahmed Shah
    Chairman, IMFI

  4. Ahmad Afzal Shah (Chairman of the Islamic Mission Foundation International) Says:

    Al-Salamu `alaykum:

    I would like to add that after Estes was expelled , the title of the head of the organization was changed from “director” to “chairman”

    Wassalam

    Ahmad Afzal Shah
    Chairman, IMFI
    afzalahmedshah@ymail.com

  5. Ahmed Afzal Shah Says:

    Wa `alaykum al-salam:

    I admit. This is all fake. I’m sorry. I would like to request that my previous comments be deleted permanently off this blog.

    Again, I’m sorry.

    Wassalam

    Ahmad


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: